“People do what they know works, including the Fed”
Now, the question for us is whether the Fed is ready to let the market go now, or will come back in and pump the usual suspects. At this moment, it feels like they are doing some Nasdaq stock pumping, so they are not ready to let it go. Timing for letting it go is more likely when Congress is back in a couple of weeks.
AUGUST 17TH, 2021
· we do not believe $3.5 trillion fiscal bill can get done at all;
· the debt ceiling will not be resolved until the earliest late October;
· the infrastructure bill is part of Pelosi’s overall package, and will likewise be stuck until late October;
· we believe that we will see another round of QE to the tune of $3 trillion the Fed can talk all they like about taper, but;
· the economic data looks to be deteriorating;
· China’s slowing down to 2-3% GDP for the next three quarters;
· Covid lockdowns impacting supply chains – Chinese lockdowns impact supply of goods to the US, which will impact fourth quarter inventories and indeed employment.
Could Biden’s ineptitude have consequences for the US economy and the markets? YES
7 months in and already Joe Biden’s presidency is coming apart at the seams. America’s humiliation at the hands of the Taliban’s ragtag army of motorcycle-mounted zealots would appear at first glance to have few implications for the economy and the stock market, but if it harms Biden’s ability to get his domestic agenda through Congress, or otherwise undermines its credibility, then it most certainly does.
Foreign policy was meant to be one of Biden’s strong points after the disruptor-in-chief approach of Trump, but the fiasco of America’s exit from Afghanistan has made Biden’s predecessor look almost sure-footed. Both were on the same page in wanting to disengage from Afghan “nation building” – arguably always a hopeless endeavour as far as this warring country is concerned, and with little wider support among American voters. But execution is something else, and that Biden has profoundly messed up now looks pretty much unarguable. Americans may have been in favour of withdrawal, but they don’t like to see the US humiliated; Biden’s approval ratings will already have plummeted and his chances in the midterms will have been correspondingly damaged.
If he can get it so wrong in Afghanistan, emboldening America’s enemies almost everywhere, you have to ask yourself what else he is misjudging. The economy, inflation, and public spending seem all too possible answers.
As it is, both economic confidence and sky-high stock market valuations are buoyed by the abandon of the US President’s $6 trillion spending plans albeit with American consumer confidence beginning to slump – see chart below for this dichotomy). The infrastructure bit of the package is uncontentious and by itself would sail through Congress without trouble. Almost everyone agrees that US infrastructure is seriously in need of an upgrade. The same cannot be said, however, of the $3.5 trillion element of the stimulus branded the American Families Plan, which has riled even some Democrats. Attempts by the House to conjoin the two in the hope of bulldozing them through as a job lot seem to have got everybody’s backs up, and therefore threaten to scupper the wider plan. Something will no doubt eventually emerge, but it may be a watered down version of the original (see a reprint of our political outlook below).
Biden’s calculation in pushing ahead with the Afghan withdrawal was that it would play well with America First, Rust Belt type voters who otherwise might drift back to Trump-style Republicanism in the midterms – see Jake Sullivan’s February 2019 article in The Atlantic for evidence of such policy intent.. Ending America’s longest ever war was a promise he was determined to stick to. But the withdrawal has backfired horribly, with America made to look incompetent, heartless, weak and shortsighted.
Leaving Afghans to their fate will not go down well with many Democrats, especially if the Taliban is true to its past, murderous and misogynistic form. Can you imagine the liberal outrage there would have been had this great humiliation occurred under Trump’s watch rather than Biden’s? Already, America’s liberal-leaning media has been unforgiving in their criticism.
In any case, the disaster of Afghanistan raises new questions about the President’s judgment, as well as the quality of his policy advice in general, heaping further opprobrium on a presidency that seems to be coming off the rails on multiple fronts. Concern over the inflationary consequences of Biden’s domestic agenda is meanwhile growing by the day. Policy on immigration, China (which will no doubt fill the vacuum left in Afghanistan by Western departure) and much else seems equally open to criticism. Only a month ago, Biden defended his decision to follow through on the military pullout agreed by his predecessor by saying that a clean sweep by the Taliban was “highly unlikely”. In the event, it has proved all too easy.
However, it was the manner of the departure which was so ill-judged. If Biden can be wrong about the Taliban, he is also likely to be wrong about much else. Does anyone, for instance, any longer believe the assurances about the “transitory” nature of today’s spike in inflation?
Meanwhile, the administration is battling a renewed wave of Covid infections, fuelled by a rampant delta variant and widespread vaccine hesitancy. It’s all shaping up to be a bleak backdrop to the 20th anniversary of 9/11. The military pull out was meant to bring the traumas of American involvement in Afghanistan to a close, but has instead left everyone questioning what the vast amounts spent on America’s “war on terror” has actually achieved. Precisely nothing seems to be the answer.
Comparisons with the fall of Saigon in 1975 look only too legitimate. Like Vietnam, American engagement in Afghanistan has proved a monumental and tragic waste of lives and money, ultimately leaving everything back where we started. In both cases, America’s military might, backed by all the latest technology, proved no match for the conviction and guerrilla tactics of committed, indigenous enemies fighting for a cause, however alien it might seem to be to western sensitivities.
Might this ignominious end to Western ambition also puncture the hubris of America’s long bull market? In this regard at least, there are few parallels with the US withdrawal from Vietnam. The Dow Jones took a beating after the fall of Saigon (see chart above), but the bear market was by that stage already well established, whereas today we are still basking in the irrational exuberance of one of the longest bull markets in history. You can have guns or butter, war or consumption, but not both, someone once said. The US tried to do both at the time of Vietnam, and it sucked America dry; investors knew it long before the politicians. The curiosity is that they have ignored this old truism in the war on terror, sending stock prices soaring even as everything else goes to hell in a handcart.
All the same, there are some obvious similarities between the two wars in terms of a perceived blow to supposed Western prowess. As a President, Biden is already starting to look more like a Jimmy Carter than a Franklin D Roosevelt – well meaning but ineffective, and certainly far from the steadying hand on the tiller that you would want for times such as these. Ultimately, that’s not going to be good, either for the economy or the stock market.
And now, to remind you, our last political outlook, as dated August 5, because it is absolutely related to the above:
Subsequently, on Ausgust 12th, we defined what we thought best for market positioning would be, along with a forecast on the size of equity index sell-off, all in accordance with our expectations above:
And if you want to hear our latest view, have a look at this podcast match-up between Albert and Andreas Steno Larsen of Nordea Bank – it is less than 10 minutes:
Back to normal tomorrow.
Nicholas H Glinsman
Direct: +1 718 577 1408
Miami: +1 305 771 2674
Mob: +55 129 8854 5492 (Brazil)
Mob: +1 212 991 8792 (US)
Mob: +44 7799 772392 (UK)
This e-mail and/or any attached documents may contain privileged and confidential information and should only be read by those persons to whom this e-mail is addressed. Use by other than intended recipients is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, you must not copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it. If you have received it in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Warning: PLEASE DO NOT FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO OTHERS OUTSIDE OF YOUR ORGANIZATION WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF EVOCAPITAL LLC. This message contains information that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, disclose or take any action based on this message. This commentary contains forecasts, estimates, opinions, and other information that are subjective. Statements concerning economic, financial, or market trends are based on current conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that such statements will be applicable under all market conditions, especially during periods of downturn. Although this commentary is based on information and data derived from sources that we deem to be reliable and accurate, these views are not guarantees of future performance or occurrence of certain events and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual events, outcomes and results may differ significantly from the views expressed. The views and opinions contained herein should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any kind. All information and statistics are current as of the date stated, unless otherwise noted, and we undertake no obligation to update them. If you would like clarification please firstname.lastname@example.org.